Providing The Latest News With Opinions

Antioch Council Should Reject Police Pension Adjustment

Let me first start off by stating that I want more police than Antioch just as badly as the next person considering my family lives there, but the Antioch City Council is making a big mistake by ramming through a policy change that would put 3@50 back in place even if police officers deserve it. This is a case of instant gratification rather than logically thinking this out.

This essentially boils down to a case of “I want experience” as opposed to “I need officers”.

According to Paul Burgarino at the Contra Costa Times,  the city needs to fill 14 police officer vacancies, and would like to hire some veteran police officers from other agencies, or lateral hires. Seasoned officers take less training time than a trainee or recent academy graduate and could quickly be put out on the streets, city officials said.

The take away is simple,  the City of Antioch is simply wanting to poach officers from other cities as opposed to hiring and training its own officers at a much lower rate. Antioch is claiming its having trouble recruiting officers, however, the staff report is showing a survey of local agencies and their retirement.

As Dan Borenstein points out,

City officials claim the change is needed to help Antioch compete for experienced cops. But a comparison shows Antioch pension benefit levels match or exceed 10 of 15 nearby cities. Moreover, the officials made no effort to figure out the cost of the change. Long-term, the city needs more cops, not more-expensive cops. In a community with very limited resources, Antioch can’t have both.

Okay, missing from the staff report is proof Antioch has had trouble poaching away officers from other agencies. How many had it approached or how many had applied? Where is the application figures? Remember, this is the same City that had over 400 people apply for code enforcement and claimed it had no qualified applicants.

So the City is not going to get experienced officers under the current hiring package. Okay, move on from your first choice and go after  bodies that can be trained to eventually become that experience desired. I am not trying to sound naive here, but beggars can’t be choosers. Hire rookies and train them the way you want them to fight crime and the police department would hopefully have them for the next thirty years fighting crime and improving the crime rate.

Under the current “want”, you are hiring veterans (obviously preferred) but realistically you only will have them for 5-10 years before they retire anyway. You might as well think long term over immediate gratification.  By moving away from veterans and training Antioch s next batch of highly trained officers, you also push back your pension liability which given the economy, that is a good thing.

For the record, I have no problem with 3@50 for public safety, they deserve it and it should be changed, but not implementing it like its being proposed in order to beat the Governors law.  I’d rather see the council decide a better course of action which is pay the officers a higher base salary as opposed to touching the pensions.  By paying a higher salary, its better for everyone and doesn’t change the long term liability as much as a pension increase would.

Antioch needs bodies, anything at this point is better than nothing.  Considering this vote is occurring directly after the election, that adds another wrinkle as this should have been a campaign issue of how one brings officers to Antioch, I doubt pension increases would have been choice No. 1.

Simple solution, pay officers more, leave pensions alone!

By Michael Burkholder

Staff Report



Tagged as:

6 Responses »

  1. Thanks for printing this! Antioch is a bankrupt city. We owe nearly 60 million in back pension liabilities. Our current budget is 1.5 mil short. Council better really think about what they are doing because if they approve this they will never get voters to pass more funding for the PD. We have a terriffic police chief and department, someone was brain dead when they thought of this.

  2. Torn on this. I want the officers, but I also do not want rookies or unqualified officers on the street. There has to be some sort of balance but this idea tonight is not it.

  3. They should not pay their officers anymore than they agreed to and pension reform is a nonstarter. Burke and the Chief are wrong! No changes should be made and begin hiring and stop being so picky!

    • Was there ever a doubt? Most likely it was the right thing to do.
      Good decisions are made by having ALL the right information….hopefully that was the case tonight.

      • Actually last Tuesday they had very little information. Tomorrows 12/4 meeting is supposed to have the actuaries figures. We should have the swearing in at 6pm and regular meeting at 7pm. CCT figure of 60 million in unfunded liabilities is correct.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: